267
akila to doette of”
to (forat Wall to motțul alqom "Loox!
·JNAM#78q8( tu basl ca tardalgo” Aug
Asid mot Vle: Curon vitalnel add raven of vinvoivɗo BBW
nt on:syon ada of betebrae sotvba est avge I bas *
to abna eft? ni vieriaus annuels bodaiqrissnos to toeqaer
ok at h.as ax tufa notulgo 21
Bu abroo neki son du.
£ novia anoseer not
1
theadqef aid no know custɔtthe ov of Lalotrlena atum
aokže too al mottos Insupendua algom(foor" to to sobr
t
aqur end of steméntoqqa enbout 10 tw
temd vor gasi ri na molzesup all në fëzani ya tetor of
*1168
od chorostaldea sieviem ai
Colw veya Ml bespaa
Show Benicmut tar
Baton"STO" 87ert si (Itw bas
við vi baznobhah aan! I ad no vlacol contar
Kofrtw wiżały:7 ads to varaloltig out ecomong of dion-04
noter or ovasi ned I .SANDEVON ... I to boon floum mi abas:B
those of which he had complained to me I do not know, but
in the correspondence which had passed between Your Excellency and myself the abstract question alone was being
discussed, the concrete case of Mr. Seth was not referred
to. And when I issued my instruction as to a diary to Mr.
Seth I was not intentionally complicating the issue: I was
merely adopting a not unusual method of gaining the necessary
information on which to make a long contemplated report
to Your Excellency on the state of the Registry; and moreover
I was, and Mr. Seth knew perfectly well, doing this in
order to carry out an intention which I had frequently
discussed with him. My action was in fact an inevitable
sequence to his frequent complaints to me. This did not
therefore 'subsequently transpire', as Your Excellency
has been led to believe. Mr. Seth knew from the first
what my object was in asking for the information.
Hotxomon
0001
31 to rei ve o
10.
On one point of detail I must point out a
os banget
of won axiaob T do
no Iseewort ontag eIT
.e
(& rmanal) ayer yone[[ext to rail teilt el Jalact
I raida "gottopatent
HB VIÐNAL eouersteb Mahu
slight inaccuracy in the 2nd. paragraph of Your Excellency's
despatch to the Secretary of State. The accurate diary
which I required was for one week only. I am not sure,
but
it occurs to me that the idea that I wanted a regular
had five?
to moltatnsanngen eTSUONE
diary to be always kept, may have some bearing on the
** VI*rupoadua gizzetao? Ini tofo.on ditiv, avstrzezui
opinion to which Your Excellency has come on the question.
11.
DEO
aas
267
akila to doette of”
..
to (forat Wall to motțul alqom "Loox!
·JNAM#78q8( tu basl ca tardalgo” Aug
Asid mot Vle: Curon vitalnel add raven of vinvoivɗo BBW
nt on:syon ada of betebrae sotvba est avge I bas *
to abna eft? ni vieriaus annuels bodaiqrissnos to toeqaer
ok at h.as ax tufa notulgo 21
窖
Bu abroo neki son du. さ
£ novia anoseer not
1
theadqef aid no know custɔtthe ov of Lalotrlena atum
aokže too al mottos Insupendua algom(foor" to to sobr
t
aqur end of steméntoqqa enbout 10 tw
temd vor gasi ri na molzesup all në fëzani ya tetor of
*1168
od chorostaldea sieviem ai
Colw veya Ml bespaa
Show Benicmut tar
Baton"STO" 87ert si (Itw bas
蒙
við vi baznobhah aan! I ad no vlacol contar
Kofrtw wiżały:7 ads to varaloltig out ecomong of dion-04
noter or ovasi ned I .SANDEVON ... I to boon floum mi abas:B
those of which he had complained to me I do not know, but
in the correspondence which had passed between Your Excel-
-lency and ryself the abstract question alone was being
discussed, the concrete case of Mr. Seth was not referred
to. And when I issued my instruction as to a diary to Mr.
Seth I was not intentionally complicating the issue: I was
merely adopting a not unusual method of raining the necessa-
-ry information on which to make a long contemplated report
to Your Excellency on the state of the Registry; and more-
-over
I was,
an Mr. Seth know perfectly well, doing this in
order to carry out an intention which I had frequently
discussed with him. My action was in fact an inevitable
sequence to his frequent complaints to me. This did not
therefore 'subsequently transpire', as Your Excellency
has been led to believe. Mr. Seth knew from the first
what my object was in asking for the information.
Hotxomon
0001
31 to rei ve o
10.
On one point of detail I must point out a
os banget
of won axiaob T do
no Iseewort ontag eIT
.e
(& rmanal) ayer yone[[ext to rail teilt el Jalact
I raida "gottopatent
HB VIÐNAL eouersteb Mahu
slight inaccuracy in the 2nd. paragraph of Your Excellency's
despatch to the Secretary of State. The accurate diary
which I required was for one week only. I am not sure,
but
it occurs to me that the idea that I wanted a regular
had five?
to moltatnsanngen eTSUONE
diary to be always kept, may have sone bearing on the
** VI*rupoadua gizzetao? Ini tofo.on ditiv, avstrzezui
opinion to which Your Excellency has come on the question.
11.
DEO
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.